![]() |
|
1. Most
consumers do not get much use out of the sports equipment they purchase. For
example, seventeen percent of the adults in the United States own jogging
shoes, but only forty-five percent of the owners jog more than once a year,
and only seventeen percent jog more than once a week.
Which of the following, if true, casts most doubt on the claim that most
consumers get little use out of the sports equipment they purchase?
(A) Joggers are most susceptible to sports injuries during the first six
months in which they jog.
(B) Joggers often exaggerate the frequency with which they jog in surveys
designed to elicit such information.
(C) Many consumers purchase jogging shoes for use in activities other than
jogging.
(D) Consumers who take up jogging often purchase an athletic shoe that can
be used in other sports.
(E) Joggers who jog more than once a week are often active participants in
other sports as well.
Explanation:
The claim that most consumers do not get much use out of the sports equipment
they purchase is supported by the infrequency with which jogging shoes are used
for jogging. This reasoning overlooks the possibility that jogging shoes are
used for other purposes; thus, choice C is the best answer.
Because injured joggers are less likely to use their jogging shoes, choice A is
inappropriate. If B is true, joggers use their jogging shoes even less than the
study cited states. So choice B is inappropriate. Because the consumers and
joggers mentioned in D and E respectively are most likely to be among those who
frequently use sports equipment and whose existence the argument concedes, D and
E are inappropriate.
2. It is true
that it is against international law to sell plutonium to countries that do not
yet have nuclear weapons. But if United States companies do not do so, companies
in other countries will.
Which of the following is most like the argument above in its logical structure?
(A) It is true that it is against the police department’s policy to negotiate
with kidnappers. But if the police want to prevent loss of life, they must
negotiate in some cases.
(B) it is true that it is illegal to refuse to register for military service.
But there is a long tradition in the United States of conscientious objection to
serving in the armed forces.
(C) It is true that it is illegal for a government official to participate in a
transaction in which there is an apparent conflict of interest. But if the facts
are examined carefully, it will clearly be seen that there was no actual
conflict of interest in the defendant’s case.
(D) It is true that it is against the law to burglarize people’s homes. But
someone else certainly would have burglarized that house if the defendant had
not done so first.
(E) It is true that company policy forbids supervisors to fire employees without
two written warnings. But there have been many supervisors who have disobeyed
this policy.
Explanation:
The argument in the passage acknowledges that a certain action contravenes a
law, but it presents an excuse for the action by presupposing that someone will
inevitably break this law. Only choice D shares all these features, and is thus
the best answer.
In Choice A, an excuse is presented for contravening a stated policy. However,
unlike in the passage and choice D, there is no presupposition that the policy
will inevitably be contravened. Similarly, choices B and E report that illegal
activities have occurred, without presupposing that they inevitably will. Choice
C describes a case as being one to which the law that is stated is inapplicable.
3. Extinction
is a process that can depend on a variety of ecological, geographical, and
physiological variables. These variables affect different species of organisms
in different ways, and should, therefore, yield a random pattern of extinctions.
However, the fossil record shows that extinction occurs in a surprisingly
definite pattern, with many species vanishing at the same time.
Which of the following, if true, forms the best basis for at least a partial
explanation of the patterned extinctions revealed by the fossil record?
(A) Major episodes of extinction can result from widespread environmental
disturbances that affect numerous different species.
(B) Certain extinction episodes selectively affect organisms with particular
sets of characteristics unique to their species.
(C) Some species become extinct because of accumulated gradual changes in their
local environments.
(D) In geologically recent times, for which there is no fossil record, human
intervention has changed the pattern of extinctions.
(E) Species that are widely dispersed are the least likely to become extinct.
Explanation:
Choice A, the best answer, asserts that some environmental disturbances can be
so widespread as to cause the extinction of numerous species. This fact helps to
explain why the fossil record frequently shows many species becoming extinct at
the same time, despite the variety of factors that can cause a species to become
extinct.
None of the other choices explain how numerous extinctions could have occurred
simultaneously in the past. Choice B explains why sometimes only a very limited
range of species become extinct. Choice C explains how some individual species
become extinct. Choice D explains why the modern period is unlike the period of
the fossil record, and choice E states which species are least likely to become
extinct.
4. Shelby
Industries manufactures and sells the same gauges as Jones Industries. Employee
wages account for forty percent of the cost of manufacturing gauges at both
Shelby Industries and Jones Industries. Shelby Industries is seeking a
competitive advantage over Jones Industries. Therefore, to promote this end,
Shelby Industries should lower employee wages.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?
(A) Because they make a small number of precision instruments, gauge
manufacturers cannot receive volume discounts on raw materials.
(B) Lowering wages would reduce the quality of employee work, and this reduced
quality would lead to lowered sales.
(C) Jones Industries has taken away twenty percent of Shelby Industries’
business over the last year.
(D) Shelby Industries pays its employees, on average, ten percent more than does
Jones Industries.
(E) Many people who work for manufacturing plants live in areas in which the
manufacturing plant they work for is the only industry.
Explanation:
According to choice B, the effect of lowering wages is to reduce quality
sufficiently to reduce sales. This is a good reason to doubt that wage cuts
would give Shelby Industries any competitive advantage, so choice B is the best
answer.
Some of the other choices provide good reasons for, rather than against,
lowering wages. Choice A implies that reducing the cost of raw materials is not
possible, choice D indicates that Shelby Industries’ wages are relatively high,
and choice E suggests that Shelby Industries would not lose many workers if it
did reduce wages. Choice C gives a reason for Shelby Industries to be concerned
about its competitive position but no reason to think wage cuts would not
improve that position.
5. Large
national budget deficits do not cause large trade deficits. If they did,
countries with the largest budget deficits would also have the largest trade
deficits. In fact, when deficit figures are adjusted so that different countries
are reliably comparable to each other, there is no such correlation.
If the statements above are all true, which of the following can properly be
inferred on the basis of them?
(A) Countries with large national budget deficits tend to restrict foreign
trade.
(B) Reliable comparisons of the deficit figures of one country with those of
another are impossible.
(C) Reducing a country’s national budget deficit will not necessarily result in
a lowering of any trade deficit that country may have.
(D) When countries are ordered from largest to smallest in terms of population,
the smallest countries generally have the smallest budget and trade deficits.
(E) Countries with the largest trade deficits never have similarly large
national budget deficits.
Explanation:
According to choice B, the effect of lowering wages is to reduce quality
sufficiently to reduce sales. This is a good reason to doubt that wage cuts
would give Shelby Industries any competitive advantage, so choice B is the best
answer.
Some of the other choices provide good reasons for, rather than against,
lowering wages. Choice A implies that reducing the cost of raw materials is not
possible, choice D indicates that Shelby Industries’ wages are relatively high,
and choice E suggests that Shelby Industries would not lose many workers if it
did reduce wages. Choice C gives a reason for Shelby Industries to be concerned
about its competitive position but no reason to think wage cuts would not
improve that position.
6. Many
breakfast cereals are fortified with vitamin supplements. Some of these cereals
provide 100 percent of the recommended daily requirement of vitamins.
Nevertheless, a well-balanced breakfast, including a variety of foods, is a
better source of those vitamins than are such fortified breakfast cereals alone.
Which of the following, if true, would most strongly support the position above?
(A) In many foods, the natural combination of vitamins with other nutrients
makes those vitamins more usable by the body than are vitamins added in vitamin
supplements.
(B) People who regularly eat cereals fortified with vitamin supplements
sometimes neglect to eat the foods in which the vitamins occur naturally.
(C)Foods often must be fortified with vitamin supplements because naturally
occurring vitamins are removed during processing.
(D) Unprocessed cereals are naturally high in several of the vitamins that are
usually added to fortified breakfast cereals.
(E) Cereals containing vitamin supplements are no harder to digest than similar
cereals without added vitamins.
Explanation: By
pointing out that, when occurring in natural combination with other nutrients,
vitamins are more usable by the body than are those same vitamins when added as
a supplement, choice A provides reason to believe that a well-balanced breakfast
is a better source of vitamins than is a fortified breakfast cereal. A is the
best answer.
Choice B does not support the position taken, although the position taken, if
correct, is relevant to the people mentioned. Choice E describes a similarity
between fortified cereals and other cereals. Choice C provides a reason for
adding supplements to processed cereals, and choice D gives information about
unprocessed cereals, but neither adds support for the alleged advantage of a
well-balanced breakfast over a fortified cereal.
7. Which of the
following best completes the passage below?
The more worried investors are about losing their money, the more they will
demand a high potential return on their investment; great risks must be offset
by the chance of great rewards. This principle is the fundamental one in
determining interest rates, and it is illustrated by the fact that——.
(A) successful investors are distinguished by an ability to make very risky
investments without worrying about their money
(B) lenders receive higher interest rates on unsecured loans than on loans
backed by collateral
(C) in times of high inflation, the interest paid to depositors by banks can
actually be below the rate of inflation
(D) at any one time, a commercial bank will have a single rate of interest that
it will expect all of its individual borrowers to pay
(E) the potential return on investment in a new company is typically lower than
the potential return on investment in a well-established company
Explanation:
Since an unsecured loan is more risky, from the lender’s point of view, than a
loan baked by collateral, the fact that lenders receive higher interest rates
for unsecured loans is an illustration of the principle outlined in the passage.
Thus, choice B is the best answer.
None of the other choices gives a clear instance in which increased risk is
compensated by the potential for increased return. Choice A does not concern
return on investment at all. Choice C is an instance of low return unrelated to
risk. In choice D, contrary to the principle, the rate of return remains
constant despite possible variations in risk, and choice E also runs counter to
the principle if investments in well-established companies entail less risk.
8. Sales of
telephones have increased dramatically over the last year. In order to take
advantage of this increase, Mammoth Industries plans to expand production of its
own model of telephone, while continuing its already very extensive advertising
of this product.
Which of the following, if true, provides most support for the view that Mammoth
Industries cannot increase its sales of telephones by adopting the plan outlined
above?
(A) Although it sells all of the telephones that it produces, Mammoth
Industries’ share of all telephone sales has declined over the last year.
(B) Mammoth Industries’ average inventory of telephones awaiting shipment to
retailers has declined slightly over the last year.
(C) Advertising has made the brand name of Mammoth Industries’ telephones widely
known, but few consumers know that Mammoth Industries owns this brand.
(D) Mammoth Industries’ telephone is one of three brands of telephone that have
together accounted for the bulk of the last year’s increase in sales.
(E) Despite a slight decline in the retail price, sales of Mammoth Industries’
telephones have fallen in the last year.
Explanation:
Choice E indicates that Mammoth’s telephones already fail to participate in the
industry trend of higher sales despite heavy advertising. Producing more of the
same model would thus be unlikely to generate increased sales for Mammoth, so E
is the best answer.
If Mammoth has sold all the telephones it produced, it might increase sales by
producing more, even if it has lost market share, as choice A states. Choice D
indicates that Mammoth’s sales are increasing, and similarly for B if the
decrease in inventory results from retailers taking delivery of more telephones.
So long as consumers recognize the brand name of Mammoth’s telephones, as choice
C states, it probably does not matter whether they associate it with Mammoth.
9. Many
institutions of higher education suffer declining enrollments during periods of
economic slowdown. At two-year community colleges, however, enrollment figures
boom during these periods when many people have less money and there is more
competition for jobs.
Each of the following, if true, helps to explain the enrollment increases in
two-year community colleges described above EXCEPT:
(A) During periods of economic slowdown, two-year community colleges are more
likely than four-year colleges to prepare their students for the jobs that are
still available.
(B) During periods of economic prosperity, graduates of two-year community
colleges often continue their studies at four-year colleges.
(C) Tuition at most two-year community colleges is a fraction of that at
four-year colleges.
(D) Two-year community colleges devote more resources than do other colleges to
attracting those students especially affected by economic slowdowns.
(E) Students at two-year community colleges, but not those at most four-year
colleges, can control the cost of their studies by choosing the number of
courses they take each term.
Explanation:
Four of the choices give reasons why, in an economic showdown, many people would
choose a two-year college. Choice A indicates that a two-year college education
gives one a better chance of finding a job when economic conditions are poor.
Choice C and E indicate why people with less money might prefer two-year
colleges. Finally, choice D suggests that more is being done to attract people
whose lives are affected by the slowdown to two-year than to four-year colleges.
Choice B, the best answer, might explain the decreased enrollment at four-year
colleges during the slowdown, but because it deals with graduates of two-year
colleges it cannot explain why enrollment at these colleges might increase.
10. In tests
for pironoma, a serious disease, a false positive result indicates that people
have pironoma when, in fact, they do not; a false negative result indicates that
people do not have pironoma when, in fact, they do. To detect pironoma most
accurately, physicians should use the laboratory test that has the lowest
proportion of false positive results.
Which of the following, if true, gives the most support to the recommendation
above?
(A) The accepted treatment for pironoma does not have damaging side effects.
(B) The laboratory test that has the lowest proportion of false positive results
causes the same minor side effects as do the other laboratory tests used to
detect pironoma.
(C) In treating pironoma patients, it is essential to begin treatment as early
as possible, since even a week of delay can result in loss of life.
(D) The proportion of inconclusive test results is equal for all laboratory
tests used to detect pironoma.
(E) All laboratory tests to detect pironoma have the same proportion of false
negative results.
Explanation:
The most accurate test for pironoma would be the one with the fewest false
results. If all tests have the same proportion of false negatives, then the most
accurate is the one that has the lowest proportion of false positives. Thus, E
supports the recommendation and is the best answer.
Choice A and C deal with the treatment for pironoma and are irrelevant to the
accuracy of tests pironoma. Choice B deals with the side effects of tests for
pironoma, and does not address their accuracy. That the proportion of
inconclusive test results is equal for all tests (choice D) leaves open the
question of which test is more accurate, since it does not indicate which test
has fewest false results.
11. When a
polygraph test is judged inconclusive, this is no reflection on the examinee.
Rather, such a judgment means that the test has failed to show whether the
examinee was truthful or untruthful. Nevertheless, employers will sometimes
refuse to hire a job applicant because of an inconclusive polygraph test result.
Which of the following conclusions can most properly be drawn from the
information above?
Most examinees with inconclusive polygraph test results are in fact untruthful.
Polygraph tests should not be used by employers in the consideration of job
applicants.
An inconclusive polygraph test result is sometimes unfairly held against the
examinee.
A polygraph test indicating that an examinee is untruthful can sometimes be
mistaken.
Some employers have refused to consider the results of polygraph tests when
evaluating job applicants.
Explanation:
The passage indicates that an inconclusive polygraph test tells nothing about
the person who has taken the test, and yet employers sometimes refuse to hire
someone whose results from such a test are inclusive. Treating lack of
information as if it were unfavorable evidence about a person can reasonably be
considered unfair. There, C is the best choice.
Choice A is not supported, since the passage says that an inconclusive polygraph
test is no reflection on the examinee. Neither B nor D is supported, since the
information given includes nothing either implicit or explicit about polygraph
tests that yield conclusive results. Since the passage is consistent with both E
and its denial, E is not supported.
12. According
to the new office smoking regulations, only employees who have enclosed office
may smoke at their desks. Virtually all employees with enclosed offices are at
the professional level, and virtually all secretarial employees lack enclosed
offices. Therefore, secretaries who smoke should be offered enclosed offices.
Which of the following is an assumption that enables the conclusion above to be
properly drawn?
(A) Employees at the professional level who do not smoke should keep their
enclosed offices.
(B) Employees with enclosed offices should not smoke at their desks, even though
the new regulations permit them to do so.
(C) Employees at the secretarial level should be allowed to smoke at their
desks, even if they do not have enclosed offices.
(D) The smoking regulations should allow all employees who smoke an equal
opportunity to do so, regardless of an employee’s job level.
(E) The smoking regulations should provide equal protection from any hazards
associated with smoking to all employees who do not smoke.
Explanation:
The regulations allow some employees-those with enclosed offices-but not others
the opportunity to smoke at their desks. If it is assumed that the regulations
should allow all employees equal opportunity to smoke, those who are currently
denied this opportunity should be given it, and so secretaries who smoke should
be offered enclosed offices. Therefore, choice D is the best answer.
None of the other choices enables the conclusion to be properly drawn. Choice A
tends to conflict with the conclusion, unless some enclosed offices are vacant.
Choice B supports no conclusion about how secretaries should be treated, and
choice C undermines the conclusion. Finally, nonsmokers already have equal
protection from hazards, so choice E cannot be used to justify making any
changes.
13. Dental
researchers recently discovered that tooth-brushes can become contaminated wth
bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat. They found that contamination
usually occurs after toothbrushes have been used for four weeks. For that
reason, people should replace their toothbrushes at least once a month.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
(A) The dental researchers could not discover why toothbrush contamination
usually occurred only after toothbrushes had been used for four weeks.
(B) The dental researchers failed to investigate contamination of toothbrushes
by viruses, yeasts, and other pathogenic microorganisms.
(C) The dental researchers found that among people who used toothbrushes
contaminated with bacterial that cause pneumonia and strep throat, the incidence
of these diseases was no higher than among people who used uncontaminated
toothbrushes.
(D) The dental researchers found that people who rinsed their toothbrushes
thoroughly in hot water after each use were as likely to have contaminated
toothbrushes as were people who only rinsed their toothbrushes hurriedly in cold
water after each use.
(E) The dental researchers found that, after six weeks of use, greater length of
use of a toothbrush did not correlate with a higher number of bacterial being
present.
Explanation:
According to choice C, using a contaminated toothbrush does not increase the
incidence of infection, so the recommendation to replace a toothbrush before it
becomes contaminated is greatly undermined. Choice C is therefore the best
answer.
Since the recommendation is based on the discovery that bacterial contamination
occurs after about four weeks, the researchers’ inability to discover why
contamination takes that long to appear does not weaken the recommendation
(choice A), nor does their failure to investigate other forms of contamination
(choice B), nor does the discovery that contamination does not worsen after six
weeks (choice E). According to choice D, even thorough washing cannot prevent
contamination, so replacing the toothbrush appears more essential, rather than
less so.
Questions 14-15
are based on the following.
To protect certain fledgling industries, the government of country Z banned
imports of the types of products those industries were starting to make. As a
direct result, the cost of those products to the buyers, several
export-dependent industries in Z, went up, sharply limiting the ability of those
industries to compete effectively in their export markets.
14. Which of
the following can be most properly inferred from the passage about the products
whose importation was banned?
(A) Those products had been cheaper to import than they were to make within
country Z’s fledgling industries.
(B) Those products were ones that country Z was hoping to export in its turn,
once the fledgling industries matured.
(C) Those products used to be imported from just those countries to which
country Z’s exports went.
(D) Those products had become more and more expensive to import, which resulted
in a foreign trade deficit just before the ban.
(E) Those products used to be imported in very small quantities, but they were
essential to country Z’s economy.
Explanation: In
Z, when the government banned imports of certain products the cost of those
produces rose, so the products must have been cheaper to import than they were
to make in Z. Therefore choice A is the best answer.
None of the other choices can be inferred. Country Z need have had no plan to
export those products later (choice B), nor need the products have come
previously from those countries to which country Z exported goods (choice C).
The products need not have become more expensive before the ban (choice D), and
they could have been imported in relatively large quantities (choice E).
15. Which of
the following conclusions about country Z’s adversely affected export-dependent
industries is best supported by the passage?
(A) Profit margins in those industries were not high enough to absorb the rise
in costs mentioned above.
(B) Those industries had to contend with the fact that other countries banned
imports from country Z.
(C) Those industries succeeded in expanding the domestic market for their
products.
(D) Steps to offset rising materials costs by decreasing labor costs were taken
in those industries.
(E) Those industries started to move into export markets that they had
previously judged unprofitable.
Explanation:
When the cost of the products rose, the competitive ability of those
export-dependent industries that bought them was sharply limited. This fact
strongly supports the claim that those industries did not have sufficiently high
profit margins to enable them to absorb the price increase, so choice A is the
best answer.
Given the limitation on their competitive ability, it is unlikely that those
industries would be able either to expand their domestic markets (choice C) or
to enter into new export markets (choice E). The other choices relate situations
that would be possible but that are not strongly supported: other countries
could have continued to permit imports from Z (choice B), and the industries may
have unable to decrease labor costs (choice D).
16.The
difficulty with the proposed high-speed train line is that a used plane can be
bought for one-third the price of the train line, and the plane, which is just
as fast, can fly anywhere. The train would be a fixed linear system, and we live
in a world that is spreading out in all directions and in which consumers choose
the free-wheel systems (cars, buses, aircraft), which do not have fixed routes.
Thus a sufficient market for the train will not exist.
Which of the following, if true, most severely weakens the argument presented
above?
(A) Cars, buses, and planes require the efforts of drivers and pilots to guide
them, whereas the train will be guided mechanically.
(B) Cars and buses are not nearly as fast as the high-speed train will be.
(C) Planes are not a free-wheel system because they can fly only between
airports, which are less convenient for consumers than the high-speed train’s
stations would be.
(D) The high-speed train line cannot use currently underutilized train stations
in large cities.
(E) For long trips, most people prefer to fly rather than to take ground-level
transportation.
Explanation:
The author argues that planes, since they are a free-wheel system, will be
preferred to the high-speed train. Choice C weakens the argument by pointing out
that planes are not a free-wheel system and are les convenient than the
high-speed train would be. Thus C is the best answer.
The special feature of the high-speed train described in A is not one that
clearly affects consumer choice one way or the other way. Since it is planes
that would compete effectively with the proposed trains, the fact that cars and
buses might not do so is irrelevant. Non-availability of certain station (choice
D) and the consumer preferences described in choice E tend to make the proposed
train less, not more, attractive and so both choices strengthen the argument.
17.Leaders of a
miners’ union on strike against Coalco are contemplating additional measures to
pressure the company to accept the union’s contract proposal. The union leaders
are considering as their principal new tactic a consumer boycott against Gasco
gas stations, which are owned by Energy Incorporated, the same corporation that
owns Coalco.
Answer to which of the following questions is LEAST directly relevant to the
union leaders’ consideration of whether attempting a boycott of Gasco will lead
to acceptance of their contract proposal?
(A) Would revenue losses by Gasco seriously affect Energy Incorporated?
(B) Can current Gasco customers easily obtain gasoline elsewhere?
(C) Have other miners’ unions won contracts similar to the one proposed by this
union?
(D) Have other unions that have employed a similar tactic achieved their goals
with it?
(E) Do other corporations that own coal companies also own gas stations?
Explanation:
Whether corporations, other than Energy Incorporated, that own coal companies
also own gas stations is not directly relevant to whether attempting a boycott
of Gasco gas stations will coerce Coalco to accept the contract proposal. Thus
choice E is the best answer.
Each of the other four questions is relevant to evaluating the chances the union
strategy has of succeeding. Choice A bears on whether the strategy would apply
sufficient economic pressure on Energy Incorporated. Choice B is relevant to
whether consumers can respond to the call for a boycott. Choice C is relevant to
whether the union’s contract proposal is a reasonable one. Choice D is relevant
because a successful precedent would favorably reflect on the union’s chances of
success.
Questions 18-19 are based on the following.
Transnational cooperation among corporations is experiencing a model renaissance
among United States firms, even though projects undertaken by two or more
corporations under a collaborative agreement are less profitable than projects
undertaken by a singly corporation . The advantage of transnational cooperation
is that such joint international projects may allow United States firms to win
foreign contracts that they would not otherwise be able to win.
18. Which of the following statements by a United States corporate officer best
fits the situation of United States firms as described in the passage above?
(A) “We would rather make only a share of the profit and also risk only a share
of a possible loss than run the full risk of a loss.”
(B) “We would rather make a share of a relatively modest profit than end up
making none of a potentially much bigger profit.”
(C) “We would rather cooperate and build good will than poison the business
climate by all-out competition.”
(D) “We would rather have foreign corporations join us in American projects than
join them in projects in their home countries.”
(E) “We would rather win a contract with a truly competitive bid of our own than
get involved in less profitable collaborative agreements.”
Explanation:
According to the passage, for certain foreign contracts United States firms can
either cooperate and hope to earn a modest profit, or not cooperate, not win the
contract, and earn no part of a larger profit. This is how choice B describes
the situation, so choice B is the best answer.
In order to earn a profit, United States firms must cooperate, so the
alternatives described in several of the choices are not in practice open to
them: the alternatives of a modest risk versus a full risk (choice A).,
cooperation versus competition (choice C), and winning on their own versus
collaborating (choice E). Since they do not have the same need to cooperate with
foreign corporations to win American contracts, choice D does not fit either.
19. Which of
the following is information provided by the passage above?
(A) Transnational cooperation involves projects too big for a single corporation
to handle.
(B) Transnational cooperation results in a pooling of resources leading to
high-quality performance.
(C) Transnational cooperation has in the past been both more common and less
common than it is now among United States firms.
(D) Joint projects between United States and foreign corporation are not
profitable enough to be worth undertaking.
(E) Joint projects between United States and foreign corporations benefit only
those who commission the projects.
Explanation: To
say that transnational cooperation is experiencing a modest renaissance means
that it used to be relatively common, became less so, and is now becoming more
common again. Therefore choice C is the best answer, since it follows from that
statement.
None of the other choices presents information provided by the passage. The
passage says nothing about the size of the projects (choice A), nor about the
quality of work in cases of transnational cooperation (choice B). Since the
passage strongly suggests transnational cooperation can be profitable for the
firms concerned, it thereby tends to contradict both the claims that joint
projects are not profitable (choice D) and that they only benefit those who
commission the projects (choice E).
20. A
compelling optical illusion called the illusion of velocity and size makes
objects appear to be moving more slowly the larger the objects are. Therefore, a
motorist’s estimate of the time available for crossing a highway with a small
car approaching is bound to be lower than it would be with a large truck
approaching.
The conclusion above would be more properly drawn if it were made clear that the
(A) truck’s speed is assumed to be lower than the car’s
(B) truck’s speed is assumed to be the same as the car’s
(C) truck’s speed is assumed to be higher than the car’s
(D) motorist’s estimate of time available is assumed to be more accurate with
cars approaching than with trucks approaching
(E) motorist’s estimate of time available is assumed to be more accurate with
trucks approaching than with cars approaching
Explanation: If
the truck’s speed is assumed to be the same the car’s, then since the truck is
larger, the optical illusion will make it appear that there is more time to
cross the highway with the truck approaching than with the car approaching.
Thus, choice B helps in establishing the conclusion and is the best answer.
If the truck’s speed is lower than the cars (choice A), the conclusion does not
depend on the illusion. If the truck’s speed is higher than the car’s (choice
C), the speed of the truck might counteract the illusion’s effect. Since the
illusion works as stated regardless of what vehicle the estimate happens to be
accurate for, neither choice D nor choice E assists in drawing the conclusions.
21. Biological
functions of many plants and animals vary in cycles that are repeated every 24
hours. It is tempting to suppose that alteration in the intensity of incident
light is the stimulus that controls these daily biological rhythms. But there is
much evidence to contradict this hypothesis.
Which of the following, if known, is evidence that contradicts the hypothesis
stated in lines 2-5 above?
(A) Human body temperature varies throughout the day, with the maximum occurring
in the late afternoon and the minimum in the morning.
(B) While some animals, such as the robin, are more active during the day,
others, such as mice, show greater activity at night.
(C) When people move from one time zone to another, their daily biological
rhythms adjust in a matter of days to the periods of sunlight and darkness in
the new zone.
(D) Certain single-cell plants display daily biological rhythms even when the
part of the cell containing the nucleus is removed.
(E) Even when exposed to constant light intensity around the clock, some algae
display rates of photosynthesis that are much greater during daylight hours than
at night.
Explanation:
Algae whose rate of photosynthesis varies on a 24-hour basis even when they are
under constant light constitute evidence against the hypothesis that it is
alterations in light that control biological cycles. Therefore choice E is the
best answer.
Choices A and B describe biological cycles, but provide no evidence about what
controls them. Choice C says that cycles can become adapted to new patterns of
light, weakly supporting the hypothesis that alterations in light control
cycles. Finally, choice D provides evidence against a different hypothesis,
namely, that it is the cell nucleus of single-cell plants that controls their
biological cycles.
22. Although
migraine headaches are believed to be caused by food allergies, putting patients
on diets that eliminate those foods to which the patients have been demonstrated
to have allergic migraine reactions frequently does not stop headaches.
Obviously, some other cause of migraine headaches besides food allergies much
exist.
Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the conclusion above?
(A) Many common foods elicit an allergic response only after several days,
making it very difficult to observe links between specific foods patients eat
and headaches they develop.
(B) Food allergies affect many people who never develop the symptom of migraine
headaches.
(C) Many patients report that the foods that cause them migraine headaches are
among the foods that they most enjoy eating.
(D) Very few patients have allergic migraine reactions as children live
migraine-free adult lives once they have eliminated from their diets foods to
which they have been demonstrated to be allergic.
(E) Very rarely do food allergies cause patients to suffer a symptom more severe
than that of migraine headaches.
Explanation: If
it is difficult to determine which foods cause migraines, then some foods that
cause allergic reactions might not have been demonstrated to do so. Hence, if
choice A is true, eliminating foods that have been demonstrated to cause
migraines might not eliminate migraines, even if food allergies are the only
cause of migraines. Choice A is the best answer.
Neither the fact some food allergies do not result in migraines (choice B), nor
the fact that few allergies result in symptoms more severe than migraines.
Choice C suggests that migraine suffers do not naturally avoid the foods at
issue. Choice D reiterates the information that eliminating certain foods does
not usually solve the problem.
23. The
technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers is a reflection of the kinds
of demand they are trying to meet. The only cyclists seriously interested in
innovation and willing to pay for it are bicycle racers. Therefore, innovation
in bicycle technology is limited by what authorities will accept as standard for
purpose of competition in bicycle races.
Which of the following is an assumption made in drawing the conclusion above?
(A) The market for cheap, traditional bicycles cannot expand unless the market
for high-performance competition bicycles expands.
(B) High-performance bicycles are likely to be improved more as a result of
technological innovations developed in small workshops than as a result of
technological innovations developed in major manufacturing concerns.
(C) Bicycle racers do not generate a strong demand for innovations that fall
outside what is officially recognized as standard for purposes of competition.
(D) The technological conservatism of bicycle manufacturers results primarily
from their desire to manufacture a product that can be sold without being
altered to suit different national markets.
(E) The authorities who set standards for high-performance bicycle racing do not
keep informed about innovative bicycle design.
Explanation: If
racers, the only cyclists interested in innovation, created a strong demand for
innovations for purposes other than official competition, then the conclusion
would not follow. Therefore choice C-which asserts that racers generate no such
demand-is assumed and is the best answer.
Since the argument is stated generally in terms of where demand for innovation
lies and how manufacturers respond to demand, no assumption is made about the
structure of the market for bicycles themselves (choice A) nor about which
manufactures are most likely to produce innovations (choice B). Choice D
presents another pressure toward technological conservatism, but the pressure is
not required by the argument. Finally, the authorities may keep a close eye on
innovation (choice E) without the argument being affected.
24. Spending on
research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase
of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a
downward trend evident since 1981 – when outlays for research and development
increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit
enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research
and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.
The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the
following is true?
(A) Business spending on research and development is usually directly
proportional to business profits.
(B) Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by
more than 8.3%.
(C) Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for
research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.
(D) In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and
development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.
(E) Tax credits market for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing
businesses to make those investments.
Explanation:
The conclusion that the tax credit did nothing to stimulate spending on research
and development would not be true if, without the credit, such spending would
have been even lower than it actually was. Thus choice D must be true for the
conclusion to be true and is the best answer.
Since a tax credit generally improves business profits, if the conclusion is
true choice A is unlikely to be true. If the tax credit was ineffective, some
other factors must determine the level of spending, and could lead to much
higher levels of spending in 1985 (against choice B), and could render a higher
level of tax credit ineffective (against choice C), but it could be that credits
are generally effective (against choice E).
25. Treatment
for hypertension forestalls certain medical expenses by preventing strokes and
heart disease. Yet any money so saved amounts to only one-fourth of the
expenditures required to treat the hypertensive population. Therefore, there is
no economic justification for preventive treatment for hypertension.
Which of the following, if true, is most damaging to the conclusion above?
(A) The many fatal strokes and heart attacks resulting from untreated
hypertension cause insignificant medical expenditures but large economic losses
of other sorts.
(B) The cost, per patient, of preventive treatment for hypertension would remain
constant even if such treatment were instituted on a large scale.
(C) In matters of health care, economic considerations should ideally not be
dominant.
(D) Effective prevention presupposes early diagnosis, and programs to ensure
early diagnosis are costly.
(E) The net savings in medical resources achieved by some preventive health
measures are smaller than the net losses attributable to certain other measures
of this kind.
Explanation: If
the results of untreated hypertension cause large economic losses, as choice A
claims, then the treatment of hypertension may well be economically justifiable.
Therefore choice A is most damaging to the conclusion and is the best answer.
Choices B and D tend to support the conclusion; choice B says that making
preventive treatment widespread would not introduce economies of scale, and
choice D identifies one aspect of prevention that is both costly and essential.
Choice C undermines a different conclusion-that society should not support
treatment for hypertension-but does not damage the conclusion actually drawn.
The fact that different preventive health measures have different economic
consequences (choice D) gives no specific information about treatment for
hypertension, and so cannot affect the conclusion drawn.
About Us - FAQ - Contact Us - Copyright 1997 - 2008 LSAT Prep Course.com - LSAT is a trademark of LSAC.
Also see GMAT Preparation, Sample GRE Tests, or Law School Admissions.